Skip to main content

Writing 02: Employment


               I have prepared for the hiring process in a variety of ways. Practically, I have reviewed the past projects on my resume in order to be able to speak competently about them and brushed up on some of the languages I use less often. On a more personal level, I have reevaluated what it is I want from an employer and what my priorities are going to be through the next few months. I know that I want to work for a company that values employees who don’t spend every waking moment behind a screen, and whose hiring process reflects that. I know I want to be back in the South, somewhat closer to home.
               As the process gets underway I have found myself leaning on the advice of my brother, who has been through the process himself and is aware of the pitfalls. He is always a level head and good listener, even though we are taking very different paths in the industry. Notre Dame’s resources have been a mixed bag. I have found that unless you are the student taking the most advantage of those resources, they become much less effective. I am not the most ardent job searcher, and as such have not been entirely impressed with campus resources. This is not necessarily a fault of the school, but rather a potential point of improvement on my end.
               The Computer Science department has been my strongest resource, not necessarily as a pure career services resource, but rather as a resource for improving both my skills and my confidence. Imposter syndrome is incredibly real in a field as technical as ours, and my interactions with the incredibly talented professors in the department have managed to help me navigate that headspace instead of diving farther into it. Confidence is a huge factor in applying and interviewing for a job and I have grown in confidence more each year.
               My largest frustration with the current hiring process at large is that of artificial meritocracy. Companies wish to appear as meritocracies and as such overvalue personal projects. Companies now expect Computer Science to be your first priority and greatest passion. As someone who has many passions outside of computers, this poses a problem. Earlier I used the term artificial meritocracy and would like to quantify that by explaining that who you know will always be more important than what you know and that personal projects are not always incredible projects. The illusion of meritocracy allows companies to make bold claims about their workforce and to set unreasonable expectations for new employees.
               All things considered, if I could tell First-Year me a few tips, I would. I would tell him to start on a single large personal project sophomore and to stick with it through college. I would definitely rework his sophomore resume, which is terribly formatted and incredibly sparse. I would also tell him to be more confident. He has skills to offer and the ability to learn quickly. I am confident that together we could do better than I did alone.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Writing 00

My decision making process is rooted in consequentialism. Growing up, my father would remind me constantly to think of the consequences of my actions, both good and bad. I am still fully learning that lesson, but strive to understand the potential impacts of my actions on myself and the word around me. This mindset bleeds into my understanding of talent. I see talent as human potential. It is something to be nurtured and strengthened. Talent is the ability of a person to affect the world around them using a particular ability or skill. The consequences of honing and developing a talent cannot be overstated, as talented individuals can change the world. The consequences of ignoring one’s talents are less immediately apparent. This is where the danger lies, the loss of human potential in underdeveloped talent is impossible to quantify and often easy to ignore.                Raw talent must be refined. For Computer Scientists, this means an understanding of when and where to apply
Post a Comment
Read more

Writing 01: Identity

               I did not come to Computer Science early. I did not have a coding class in high school or start editing game code in my garage. In fact I avoided Computer Science as much as possible because it was something my brother did. Our relationship was often rocky in high school and I could not bear to start learning something he already knew so well; it would have been humiliating. Imagine my surprise when during my Intro to Engineering course I discovered that coding was something I enjoyed and was good at after all. This mindset originally caused me to stray away from the computing stereotypes I saw in my brother. I didn’t immediately switch to Linux and swear off Windows; I didn’t put all my time into passion projects. I let coding be a part of my school life, but kept it at a cautious distance.                This has changed. As much as I resisted I couldn’t completely avoid the siren call of computing culture. Recently I have started to read research papers, plan pers
Post a Comment
Read more

Writing 03: Diversity, Codes of Conduct

           The past week of class has been enlightening, and not always in a positive way. It is easy for us, as students of progressive institution lauded for bringing together the best and the brightest, to assume that we are not ensnared in the same traps as the rest of American society. We are. The discussion in the past week has been filled with the same heated, bipolar rhetoric that has become a hallmark of American media. Presented with a simple fact, that computer science falls well short of diversity benchmarks, we could not have a discussion that would bring people together, but rather farther alienated members of our community. Those who felt affected by the lack of diversity shared their experiences only to be questioned at length and trivialized. Those who saw little problem with the issue were met with contempt and apparent judgment. The inability to communicate effectively and understand that dissenting opinions can lead to communal understanding and growth does nothing
Post a Comment
Read more